[R6RS] `eqv?' on immutable records
Anton van Straaten
anton at appsolutions.com
Sun May 13 13:13:04 EDT 2007
Michael Sperber wrote:
> William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> writes:
>>>>It was a mistake to tag immutable pairs, vectors, strings,
>>>>and especially procedures with a location....
>>>I agree with you. Is anyone here against fixing this, at least for
>>>pairs, vectors, and strings?
I agree in principle that it would be good to fix this, although I'm
interested in hearing Kent's perspective on the interaction with eqv? on
But I also wonder if it's too late to try to make any major change given
the current schedule. E.g. what would the impact on the formal
More information about the R6RS