[R6RS] `eqv?' on immutable records
sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Sun May 13 13:27:12 EDT 2007
Anton van Straaten <anton at appsolutions.com> writes:
> But I also wonder if it's too late to try to make any major change given
> the current schedule.
I don't think it would be a major change, given that the current/R5RS
semantics is so obscure.
> E.g. what would the impact on the formal semantics be?
Well, location tags are needed for mutable objects anyway. I'm not sure
if it's grown the "immutable" flag I asked for a long time ago, but I'll
check tomorrow. In either case, it shouldn't be a problem.
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS