[R6RS] Semantics of `raise'

Michael Sperber sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Mon Mar 13 12:13:06 EST 2006

William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> writes:

> I still think the textual description of raise-continuable
> in my previous message is the intended semantics.

Absolutely.  I believe what you said explicitly was implicit (but
unambigous) in my version, but in any case we agree.

Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

More information about the R6RS mailing list