[R6RS] Semantics of `raise'
William D Clinger
will at ccs.neu.edu
Mon Mar 13 11:48:52 EST 2006
Oops! Please ignore the code in my previous message,
which was grossly incorrect. The with-exception-handlers
code in the SRFI-34 reference implementation already does
the right thing, so raise-continuable is just:
(define (raise-continuable obj)
(let ((handlers *current-exception-handlers*))
(with-exception-handlers (cdr handlers)
((car handlers) obj)))))
I still think the textual description of raise-continuable
in my previous message is the intended semantics.
More information about the R6RS