[R6RS] mutability of pairs
sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Wed Jun 21 01:00:49 EDT 2006
William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> writes:
> Kent asked:
>> Should we also say we're considering requiring that cons's
>> second argument be a list?
> It's okay with me to say we're considering it, but it's
> orthogonal to mutability. There's something to be said
> for having an 8-byte representation that associates x
> with y. There is also something to be said for having
> list operations that know their argument is a list.
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS