[R6RS] mutability of pairs
William D Clinger
will at ccs.neu.edu
Tue Jun 20 14:39:31 EDT 2006
> Should we also say we're considering requiring that cons's
> second argument be a list?
It's okay with me to say we're considering it, but it's
orthogonal to mutability. There's something to be said
for having an 8-byte representation that associates x
with y. There is also something to be said for having
list operations that know their argument is a list.
More information about the R6RS