[R6RS] Making continuations created by BEGIN accept multiple values
Sun Oct 10 16:06:13 EDT 2004
This one was also on the list of issues.
I propose we do this because:
- every single Scheme implementation I've tried supports this
- many programs make use of this
I have a question on the issue: Some people at the workshop suggested
that, having this extension of R5RS, it might make sense to have forms
that don't have a natural return value (SET! for example) return zero
return values instead of some dummy "void" or "unspecific" value.
Kent commented "We killed that bird a long time ago." Could some
elaborate what the issues are here?
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS