[R6RS] Making continuations created by BEGIN accept multiple
Fri Oct 15 03:13:09 EDT 2004
> This one was also on the list of issues.
> I propose we do this because:
> - every single Scheme implementation I've tried supports this
> - many programs make use of this
> I have a question on the issue: Some people at the workshop suggested
> that, having this extension of R5RS, it might make sense to have forms
> that don't have a natural return value (SET! for example) return zero
> return values instead of some dummy "void" or "unspecific" value.
> Kent commented "We killed that bird a long time ago." Could some
> elaborate what the issues are here?
I would appreciate that because I don't get the point here :-)
More information about the R6RS