[R6RS] Semantics of multiple-value mismatch

William D Clinger will at ccs.neu.edu
Tue Mar 27 11:32:57 EDT 2007

Mike wrote:
> The motion I have in mind would affect the wording in sections 4.7
> and 9.17:

I will abstain when we vote on Mike's motion.

Assuming Mike's motion passes, I will then offer
the following motion:

    Section 4.7, let-values, let*-values, values,
    and call-with-values should be removed from
    the language and the report.


More information about the R6RS mailing list