[R6RS] library syntax

William D Clinger will at ccs.neu.edu
Tue Jul 25 12:26:56 EDT 2006

Kent wrote:
> Here's a revision of the library syntax proposal.  Only the <export-spec>
> syntax and associated note about phasihg is new.

Some minor comments:

I think we approved a (define <variable>) syntax.
Shouldn't it be allowed in library bodies?

The productions for <import-set> refer to <X-set>,
for which there are no productions.

Where it says "indirect-export forms would be ignored
except within a library <body>", I think the last two
words should be changed to "<library body>".


More information about the R6RS mailing list