[R6RS] record-constructor suggestion

[Michael Sperber]

dyb at cs.indiana.edu writes:

> I suggest that we add an rtd argument to record-constructor and make the
> record-constructor-descriptor argument optional.

Any reason why you don't always accept a single argument and make a
case distinction between an rtd and a constructor descriptor?

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla