[R6RS] Refining `violation'

Michael Sperber sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Thu Aug 3 14:14:59 EDT 2006

Now that we've settled on the condition hierarchy, it seems it makes
sense to either add a procedure `contract-violation' that does the
same as the current `violation', but uses &contract instead of
&violation.  (Actually, I think, in light of this, `violation' should
then be ditched.)  Objections?

Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

More information about the R6RS mailing list