[R6RS] SYNTAX-CASE

[Manuel Serrano]

> >>>>> "Manuel" == Manuel Serrano <Manuel.Serrano at sophia.inria.fr> writes:
> 
> Manuel> Voting on SYNTAX-CASE, as it is now? If this is what you mean, I imagine
> Manuel> that there is no more need for me to work on an alternative pattern matching
> Manuel> proposal...
> 
> I think Marc was following up on Kent's suggestion, which was:
> 
> > I would like for us to vote to include syntax-case while leaving
> > open the possibility of changing the pattern matcher at a later
> > time.  In other words, I'd like for us to have, by default, a subset
> > of syntax-case essentially as it exists today, so that we have some
> > version of it in R6RS even if we fail to come up with a compatible
> > general matcher.
> 
> This means we can still discuss changes to the proposal, but gives
> Kent enough license to write down the bulk of it.  Right?
Let's do it as you want. If you think that we should vote, let's vote.

-- 
Manuel