Anton van Straaten scripsit:
> A value named "unspecified" (or #<unspecified>, #!unspecified etc.) is
> used by Chicken, Larceny, and SCM, at least. Others (in addition to
> Scheme 48) use some variant such as "unspecific". Others, of course,
> use a variation on "void", apparently borrowed from C.
The current implementation of Chicken does not have any such read-syntax.
If forced to (as by display), the unspecified value will print as
#<unspecified>, but it can't be reread. However, the core procedure
"void" returns the unspecified value when invoked.
--
That you can cover for the plentiful John Cowan
and often gaping errors, misconstruals, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and disinformation in your posts cowan_at_ccil.org
through sheer volume -- that is another
misconception. --Mike to Peter
Received on Thu Sep 21 2006 - 23:21:57 UTC