[R6RS] `eqv?' on immutable records

Michael Sperber sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Thu May 17 08:30:43 EDT 2007

"R. Kent Dybvig" <dyb at cs.indiana.edu> writes:

> Based on the notes I've seen from Will, Mike, and Anton, however, the
> concensus appears to be against me.  Since time is short, if no support
> for my "all compound objects have location tags" position materializes in
> the next 24 hours or so, I suggest we move ahead with the "all mutable
> compound objects have location tags, but immutable compound objects may or
> may not have location tags" position.

Thank you.  This has been done in revision 1699.  You might want to
check the details.

Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

More information about the R6RS mailing list