[R6RS] `eqv?' on immutable records
sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Thu May 17 08:30:43 EDT 2007
"R. Kent Dybvig" <dyb at cs.indiana.edu> writes:
> Based on the notes I've seen from Will, Mike, and Anton, however, the
> concensus appears to be against me. Since time is short, if no support
> for my "all compound objects have location tags" position materializes in
> the next 24 hours or so, I suggest we move ahead with the "all mutable
> compound objects have location tags, but immutable compound objects may or
> may not have location tags" position.
Thank you. This has been done in revision 1699. You might want to
check the details.
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS