[R6RS] [R6RS-private] Proofreading
sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Wed May 16 13:30:20 EDT 2007
Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> writes:
> I read all my sections and committed some minor edits [...]
Whoa, that was fast! Thanks!
> I have two questions:
> r6rs 9.6.5: and/or: do we need to say anything about multiple values for the
> last expression?
I think that case is clearcut (i.e. all values are returned), but the
description could be made clearer. But now that you mention it, I
wonder about the continuations created by `if', `and', and `or'. Are
they the same as continuations created by procedure calls (i.e. largely
unspecified wrt. multiple values), or do we enforce single values? I'm
assuming the former, but am not sure.
> r6rs-lib 6.3: what if the `fields' clause is absent?
I assume that's equivalent to an empty `fields' clause. I'll make it
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS