[R6RS] `eqv?' on immutable records

Michael Sperber sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Fri May 11 10:47:36 EDT 2007


William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> writes:

>> More generally, we say right now that even immutable pairs, vectors, and
>> strings denote storage locations: In the light of the above, shouldn't
>> we also make adjustments here to make them the same as immutable
>> records?
> That was a mistake that was put into the R5RS at the
> insistence of the rabble.  You are certainly free to
> make the same mistake in the R6RS.

Just to be sure I understand what you're saying: Which one's the

Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

More information about the R6RS mailing list