[R6RS] Argument order with `fxcopy-bit' and `fxcopy-bit-field'
sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Thu Jun 28 10:36:42 EDT 2007
William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> writes:
> Mike wrote:
>> With `fxcopy-bit', the "source" argument is first. With
>> `fxcopy-bit-field', it is last (and the "replacement" argument is
>> first), which seems counterintuitive for me. Is this intentional?
> Are you misreading the specification?
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS