[R6RS] Argument order with `fxcopy-bit' and `fxcopy-bit-field'

Michael Sperber sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Thu Jun 28 05:13:06 EDT 2007

With `fxcopy-bit', the "source" argument is first.  With
`fxcopy-bit-field', it is last (and the "replacement" argument is
first), which seems counterintuitive for me.  Is this intentional?

Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

More information about the R6RS mailing list