[R6RS] Empty `case' and `cond' expressions?

R. Kent Dybvig dyb at cs.indiana.edu
Fri Jun 8 16:15:52 EDT 2007

> We did it for `case-lambda', shouldn't we do it for `case' and `cond' as
> well?

I wouldn't mind, but the situation is not entirely analogous, so I don't
think we need to do so just for the sake of consistency.


More information about the R6RS mailing list