[R6RS] cost of letrec* semantics for internal definitions

William D Clinger will at ccs.neu.edu
Thu Feb 1 19:14:34 EST 2007

Kent wrote:

> > ... but I do not know of anything in
> > the 5.92 draft that would allow implementations to
> > reject programs before execution for reasons such as
> > those we are discussing here.
> Me neither, hence my phrasing "could easily addressed by allowing".

Can we add that to the agenda?  Or does someone have
to make a formal comment first?


More information about the R6RS mailing list