[R6RS] Merge `put-string-n' into `put-string'?
sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Wed Apr 25 12:44:19 EDT 2007
Here's a post on r6rs-discuss that probably should have been a formal
> Ken Friedenbach kenliz at cruzio.com
> Sat Mar 3 12:18:19 EST 2007
> Previous message: [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?
> Next message: [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] bytevector aliasing severely impedes optimizations
> Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> In Library section 7.2.12 are both put-string and put-string-n
> necessary? It seems these two procedures could be combined, since put-
> string as described is identical to put-string-n with both start and
> count default values.
> I recommend just defining put-string with the parameters and default
> values of put-string-n.
I recommend accepting this proposal. Any objections?
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS