[R6RS] recommendations for blue/minor/"needs discussion first"
mflatt at cs.utah.edu
Tue Nov 28 21:52:33 EST 2006
Even though we haven't discussed them, yet, I've added recommendations
for all of my blue/minor/"needs discussion first" tickets into the
tracking system. My recommendations are based mostly on discussion from
the r6rs-discuss list.
Here's a summary:
92, 109, 110, 123: libraries and phasing
Essentially keep the status-quo compromise, but revise the
specification to be less precise about invocation and visit times
(which is related to #87).
126: local imports
Continue to punt.
81, 127: `add-prefix'
Keep it, but rename to just `prefix' (as suggested by #81)
82: `for' syntax
Leave it alone. My opinion on this one is very weak, though.
More information about the R6RS