[R6RS] Enumerations proposal pre-draft
sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Wed May 24 02:27:50 EDT 2006
William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> writes:
> Mike wrote:
>> >> I would think that <constructor-syntax> will be much more common.
>> >> Given that there's `enum-set-constructor', I don't think <constructor>
>> >> is needed in the syntax form. Given that it's not expected to be the
>> >> common form, I think a list of symbols would be more appropriate.
>> > Okay.
>> ... but then you went the other way. Is there a rationale?
> No, I didn't. The <constructor> procedure takes a list of
> symbols, and the <constructor-syntax> takes a bunch of unquoted
Then, I think, the examples are wrong:
((enum-set-constructor (make-enumeration '(black white red green)))
> The curried procedures encourage a phase separation that should
> make them blazingly fast in practice. Uncurried versions would
> not be as fast.
Fine with me. Let's go with it.
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS