[R6RS] revised^1 exception vote list
sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Mon May 15 14:37:06 EDT 2006
William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> writes:
> Mike wrote:
>> Correct? If not, could you explain?
> Close, but not quite correct. For technical reasons related
> to the difficulty of describing the semantics Kent requested,
> a plausible prefix is not a Scheme value, and therefore not
> a possible argument to any procedure. Hence the explosive
> locution in munition 22.
OK, I understand where I messed up. However, I still don't grok what
"the first Scheme value of a plausible prefix of length n" is. (Maybe
my brain misparenthesizes?) It might help if you could briefly
explain what the difference between munitions 22 and 23 are.
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS