[R6RS] `ormap' and `andmap'

William D Clinger will at ccs.neu.edu
Mon May 1 10:22:58 EDT 2006

By way of explaining my "no" vote on andmap and ormap (19 and 20):
I don't think it's a good idea to propose one or two
procedures from a SRFI, especially when changing their
names or semantics in some random way, without considering
the entire SRFI and how it could/should be recast as a
library.  I would welcome a discussion of SRFI-1 and its


More information about the R6RS mailing list