[R6RS] multiple-value binding
mflatt at cs.utah.edu
Wed Mar 1 17:48:32 EST 2006
At Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:25:02 -0500, dyb at cs.indiana.edu wrote:
> I'd like to revive the multiple-value binding discussion. I believe
> there have been three basic proposals for a multiple-value binding form,
> which I've identified as 1, 2, and 3 below. To that I'm adding a fourth.
My preference is 1 > 4 > 3 > 2.
My only strong opinion is against 2, because it's too subtle.
More information about the R6RS