[R6RS] List library vs. core

Anton van Straaten anton at appsolutions.com
Sun Jun 25 23:10:32 EDT 2006


William D Clinger wrote:
> Mike wrote:
> 
>>We decided we would put the new list procedures into a separate
>>library.  Right now, it looks a bit inconsistent because the whole set
>>of remp, remove, remv, remq is in that library, but only assp and memp
>>of the assoc- and member-related sets, where the rest currently
>>resides in the core.  I suggest that we also move memq, memv, and
>>member, assq, assv, and assoc to the list library....
> 
> 
> That is what I would prefer.

I've made this change to draft/corelib/library-contents.html in svn.



More information about the R6RS mailing list