[R6RS] non-opaque record equality

William D Clinger will at ccs.neu.edu
Fri Feb 24 17:00:09 EST 2006

Matthew asked:
> Would it make sense for two records could be `equal?' when 
>  1. they are instances of the same *non-opaque* record type, and 
>  2. their corresponding field values are all `equal?'
> ? This change seems consistent with the SRFI's reflection support on
> non-opaque records.

That sounds right to me.


More information about the R6RS mailing list