[R6RS] Ticket Status as of svn repository revision 1196:

Michael Sperber sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Fri Dec 15 15:28:51 EST 2006

dyb at cs.indiana.edu writes:

>> That is beside the point of Jaffer's comment.  See the response
>> draft.  Do you disagree with the response?
> Yes, I disagree with the repsonse, which seems to commit us to requiring
> that UIDs be library names and flushing generative record types.  

My intent was to only do this:

>   * to make the effective UID a combination of the supplied UID and
>     the record name

> Moreover, it seems your reading is different from mine, so whatever we
> decide, we should spell it out in the response and not simply agree to the
> formal comment or to "all but XXX" in the formal comment.  In otherwords,
> the response should say what the next draft will have, not whether we
> agree to the comment.

Sure.  I'm fading out for the day---could you guys finish this one?

Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

More information about the R6RS mailing list