[R6RS] Ticket Status as of svn repository revision 1196:
sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Fri Dec 15 15:28:51 EST 2006
dyb at cs.indiana.edu writes:
>> That is beside the point of Jaffer's comment. See the response
>> draft. Do you disagree with the response?
> Yes, I disagree with the repsonse, which seems to commit us to requiring
> that UIDs be library names and flushing generative record types.
My intent was to only do this:
> * to make the effective UID a combination of the supplied UID and
> the record name
> Moreover, it seems your reading is different from mine, so whatever we
> decide, we should spell it out in the response and not simply agree to the
> formal comment or to "all but XXX" in the formal comment. In otherwords,
> the response should say what the next draft will have, not whether we
> agree to the comment.
Sure. I'm fading out for the day---could you guys finish this one?
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS