[R6RS] Ticket Status as of svn repository revision 1196:
sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Fri Dec 15 13:53:01 EST 2006
dyb at cs.indiana.edu writes:
> 73: This still needs to be decided.
> I propose that we adopt the following response:
> The next draft report will suggest a convention (not requirement)
> that users construct UIDs either from library and record-type names
> or from names constructed using the UUID namespace.
That is beside the point of Jaffer's comment. See the response
draft. Do you disagree with the response?
> 80: This still needs to be decided
> I propose the following response: [...]
OK. (Replacing "simple-i/o" by "(r6rs i/o simple)".)
> 129: We have agreement to accept the formal comment, but still need to
> decide on the syntax:
> Option 1: (nongenerative #t)
> - with (nongenerative #f) or the absense of a nongenerative clause
> implying generative
> Option 2: (nongenerative)
> - with the absense of a nongenerative clause implying generative
> I propose option 2.
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS