[R6RS] some response issues
Anton van Straaten
anton at appsolutions.com
Fri Dec 15 13:36:48 EST 2006
Some issues I noticed. None of these are critical.
#54: This is a duplicate of ticket #21, which was captured twice (once
by me and once by someone else). I plan not to publish it.
#23: the message which effectively withdrew the comment did so "in favor
of providing an example of this usage", where "this usage" presumably
refers to constructing a file-options object from a list of symbols.
Should the reponse mention that the editors will provide a suitable
example in the next draft?
#107: We discussed specifying #!cs and #!ci in a non-normative appendix.
Should the response mention this?
#117 doesn't actually say that we're rejecting the suggestion, although
I suppose it's strongly implied.
More information about the R6RS