[R6RS] record-constructor suggestion

Michael Sperber sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Mon Aug 28 10:47:59 EDT 2006

dyb at cs.indiana.edu writes:

> I suggest that we add an rtd argument to record-constructor and make the
> record-constructor-descriptor argument optional.

Any reason why you don't always accept a single argument and make a
case distinction between an rtd and a constructor descriptor?

Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

More information about the R6RS mailing list