[R6RS] draft Unicode SRFI

Matthew Flatt mflatt
Thu Jun 30 11:21:14 EDT 2005

At Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:14:44 +0200, Michael Sperber wrote:
> I'm more confused than ever: I asked the question explicitly whether
> compatibility with C and/or Java was important, and only Marc
> replied---but we have some weird mix now that I'm not positive is
> really going to make things zippy for the C/Java people.  I asked if
> people actively preferred the \[xuU] notation over Gambit-C's, and the
> situation is similarly confused.

I've abandoned the idea of complete compatibility with C. Still, I'd
prefer to build on C-style conventions instead of creating something
radically different. That's why I favor things like \x and \u over
Gambit's notation.


More information about the R6RS mailing list