[R6RS] Records draft
Thu Jun 23 03:15:54 EDT 2005
> It's there for two reasons:
> - for explaining the semantics
> - to enable introspection, i.e. for debuggers or pretty printers
> It explicitly has library status in the draft---I expect that Scheme
> implementors who are violently opposed to non-opaque records will just
> not implement that part.
I understand both points. I don't have a strong opinion on this. If
there is a general feeling that we do need the procedural interface I won't
be opposed to adopt it.
More information about the R6RS