[R6RS] Naming for fixnum / flonum ops

Marc Feeley feeley
Mon Jul 4 14:41:55 EDT 2005

On 4-Jul-05, at 10:41 AM, dyb at cs.indiana.edu wrote:

> I prefer fxquotient.  I'd rather we not relegate the fixnum operators
> to a library or assume a qualified module name syntax in the naming of
> these operators.

Can you give a rationale, or is it just a matter of taste?  Isn't  
this a perfect example of library (i.e. separating out operations on  
fixnums and on flonums in separate libraries)?


More information about the R6RS mailing list