[R6RS] Naming for fixnum / flonum ops
Mon Jul 4 14:41:55 EDT 2005
On 4-Jul-05, at 10:41 AM, dyb at cs.indiana.edu wrote:
> I prefer fxquotient. I'd rather we not relegate the fixnum operators
> to a library or assume a qualified module name syntax in the naming of
> these operators.
Can you give a rationale, or is it just a matter of taste? Isn't
this a perfect example of library (i.e. separating out operations on
fixnums and on flonums in separate libraries)?
More information about the R6RS