[R6RS] draft Unicode SRFI

Michael Sperber sperber
Fri Jul 1 12:36:18 EDT 2005

Marc Feeley <feeley at iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> On 1-Jul-05, at 12:20 PM, Michael Sperber wrote:
>> Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> writes:
>>> Is there anyone who *doesn't* think I should change to the more
>>> conventional assumption that newlines have been sorted out before
>>> parsing?
>> I don't.  The newline encoding belongs right with the text encoding
>> itself, and thus should be sorted out before parsing.
> If I interpret Matthew's question correctly, you shouldn't have  
> answered because you *do* think the conventional assumption is  
> correct (I just want to avoid the other editors thinking they need to  
> respond).

Your interpretation is correct.  It still makes sense for people to
answer in order to show that they've read the question and have an

Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla

More information about the R6RS mailing list