[R6RS] draft Unicode SRFI
Fri Jul 1 11:03:49 EDT 2005
At Fri, 1 Jul 2005 10:58:55 -0400, Marc Feeley wrote:
> I think we should iron out the differences, or give a better
> rationale for departing from the C syntax. I propose:
> 1) drop \e (and to be consistent, #\esc)
> 2) keep \' \v \a
> 3) add \?
> 4) require 8 hex digits after \U (I think \U will occur very
> in code, so we might as well make it compatible with C99,
> Python and other
> languages). The value still has to fall in 0..#x10ffff.
This sounds right to me.
More information about the R6RS