[R6RS] Re: Ambiguities with Kent's modules
Sat Feb 26 09:45:39 EST 2005
>>>>> "RK" == Richard Kelsey <kelsey at s48.org> writes:
RK> From: Michael Sperber <sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
RK> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 18:05:49 +0100
RK> I've got a favor to ask---could you post one or two examples about the
RK> ambiguities arising from the interaction between Kent-style modules,
RK> macros and DEFINE?
RK> Do you mean the ambiguities that arise from using the
RK> environment to expand a macro whose expansion may
RK> affect the environment? This isn't unique to Kent-style
RK> modules; it shows up with ordinary internal DEFINE.
RK> Yes, I know. But for Kent, the motivation for internal DEFINE goes
RK> hand in hand with the motivation for his module system.
RK> I just wanted to be sure that that was the issue you had in mind.
I really would like to see the complexity issue explained
better---it'd be great if you could write up those examples :-)
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS