[R6RS] libraries

[dyb at cs.indiana.edu]

> > Well, under the current proposal, you'll always be able to do so as an
> > extension to the language, just not portably.
> No. I don't think that it is possible to implement a compiler for the LIBRARY
> form that supports both EPS and the proper checks required by the form.
> The current proposal assumes a unique identifier space.

I'm not sure what the problem is, but I would think that the "eps
keywords" in your extension can just be considered a new class identifier
distinct from standard keywords and therefore not subject to the same
rules.

Kent