[R6RS] New draft of arithmetic SRFI
Sun Aug 14 03:56:12 EDT 2005
dyb at cs.indiana.edu writes:
> Okay, so you aren't going to make the change I suggested and make
> the fixnum operators signal an error instead of wrapping on overflow.
This wasn't meant to be any positive political statement---I'm
personally agnostic. I'm sure that the issue will come up in the SRFI
discussion. Given that we don't know the result, I was reluctant to
make a change we might reverse later on, purely for reasons of
laziness and lack of available time.
> Would you at least include an issue discussing this possibility,
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS