[R6RS] Syntax for multiple values

Michael Sperber sperber
Sat Aug 13 08:55:19 EDT 2005

When we had the last round of discussion on this, people seemed to
favor adopting LET-VALUES and friends.  (Including myself.)

I just finalized Sebastian Egner's SRFI 71, and I have to admit I like
it better than LET-VALUES.  Specifically, it avoids the triple opening
paren in the common case, and doesn't require me to switch from LET to
a new binding form when multiple values enter the picture---thus, it
has better "upgrade continuity."


Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla

More information about the R6RS mailing list