[R6RS] draft module SRFI

Michael Sperber sperber
Sat Aug 6 06:55:17 EDT 2005

Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> writes:

>> - last issue bullet: "[...] determining the phase of an import would
>>   require macro-expanding the module body." I don't understand this:
>>   the phasing can influence the macro expansion, right?  Wouldn't this
>>   introduce a circularity into the semantics?
> Not as far as I can tell. Do you have an example in mind?

I'm unsure of how this would work, so I'm kind of hard-pressed here.

> I'm not really inclined to debate it, though, since I'd rather not go
> this route.

Does anyone else?  If not, we might want to elide this bullet.

Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla

More information about the R6RS mailing list