[R6RS] revised draft of record srfi

Matthew Flatt mflatt
Tue Aug 2 16:18:05 EDT 2005

> > I didn't realize the record? predicate would return true even
> > for opaque records.  One way to solve the problem would be to
> > make the record? predicate return false for opaque records.
> > I would favor that change.

I also favor making `record?' return #f for opaque records.

I'd be happy to see `init!' dropped, but it doesn't bother me much. 

I'd prefer that all "unspecified"s be resolved. At this point, I can
live with either generative or non-generative records (i.e., whichever
would lead to agreement).

Otherwise, I'm generally content with the current proposal.


More information about the R6RS mailing list