[R6RS] revised draft of record srfi
Tue Aug 2 16:18:05 EDT 2005
> > I didn't realize the record? predicate would return true even
> > for opaque records. One way to solve the problem would be to
> > make the record? predicate return false for opaque records.
> > I would favor that change.
I also favor making `record?' return #f for opaque records.
I'd be happy to see `init!' dropped, but it doesn't bother me much.
I'd prefer that all "unspecified"s be resolved. At this point, I can
live with either generative or non-generative records (i.e., whichever
would lead to agreement).
Otherwise, I'm generally content with the current proposal.
More information about the R6RS