Fri Apr 8 11:14:05 EDT 2005
> >>>>> "Manuel" == Manuel Serrano <Manuel.Serrano at sophia.inria.fr> writes:
> Manuel> Voting on SYNTAX-CASE, as it is now? If this is what you mean, I imagine
> Manuel> that there is no more need for me to work on an alternative pattern matching
> Manuel> proposal...
> I think Marc was following up on Kent's suggestion, which was:
> > I would like for us to vote to include syntax-case while leaving
> > open the possibility of changing the pattern matcher at a later
> > time. In other words, I'd like for us to have, by default, a subset
> > of syntax-case essentially as it exists today, so that we have some
> > version of it in R6RS even if we fail to come up with a compatible
> > general matcher.
> This means we can still discuss changes to the proposal, but gives
> Kent enough license to write down the bulk of it. Right?
Let's do it as you want. If you think that we should vote, let's vote.
More information about the R6RS