Fri Apr 8 09:53:05 EDT 2005
>>>>> "Manuel" == Manuel Serrano <Manuel.Serrano at sophia.inria.fr> writes:
Manuel> Voting on SYNTAX-CASE, as it is now? If this is what you mean, I imagine
Manuel> that there is no more need for me to work on an alternative pattern matching
I think Marc was following up on Kent's suggestion, which was:
> I would like for us to vote to include syntax-case while leaving
> open the possibility of changing the pattern matcher at a later
> time. In other words, I'd like for us to have, by default, a subset
> of syntax-case essentially as it exists today, so that we have some
> version of it in R6RS even if we fail to come up with a compatible
> general matcher.
This means we can still discuss changes to the proposal, but gives
Kent enough license to write down the bulk of it. Right?
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS