[R6RS] I/O <-> GC question
Tue Nov 23 14:12:56 EST 2004
> >>>>> "Marc" == Marc Feeley <feeley at IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:
> Marc> Michael, I think a more transparent approach to designing the I/O
> Marc> system would be preferable.
> I'm sorry, I have to blow up now. There's a bit too much "Scheme
> community" feeling here.
> You're criticizing a proposal before you've even seen it. Worse,
> you're criticizing it before there even *is* one. I'm currently
> preparing to write it. Yet you already know that it's not
> sufficiently "transparent". If you don't want to answer my question,
> don't answer it. If you want to participate in the pre-design of the
> I/O library, say so.
> Jeez ...
My comment is not about the transparency of your design. My comment
is about the transparency of your design process (i.e. I (and probably
the other editors) would like to know more about the problems you are
tackling). Please share your ideas!
More information about the R6RS