[R6RS] Re: R6RS = Common Scheme?
Fri Jan 30 22:07:09 EST 2004
Michael Sperber wrote:
> >>>>> "Manuel" == Manuel Serrano <Manuel.Serrano at sophia.inria.fr> writes:
> Manuel> I understand Marc as "let us check if with a minimal effort we can make
> Manuel> real progress by adding features every major implementation has or
> Manuel> could adds easily". Marc, Am I correct?
> Probably---even though Marc also added something about uncontroversial
> Marc came up with a pretty short list. I could think of probably
> hundreds of things that would be an answer to that question, so I was
> wondering what was special about the ones Marc picked.
My first list was just a "for example". Apparently you don't think the
things I listed are common to the major implementations. Perhaps you are
right in the strict sense, but I have a looser meaning for "common" (see
my previous emails).
More information about the R6RS