[R6RS] Re: R6RS = Common Scheme?
Thu Jan 29 10:37:06 EST 2004
> Marc> The term "Common Scheme" was meant tongue-in-cheek. Let's not start a
> Marc> debate about what it means. Our time can be spent more productively
> Marc> if we first elaborate a list of concrete issues to discuss.
> Sorry if I sounded snide; that wasn't my intention. I really was
> wondering what criteria we should use to contribute to this specific
> list. I don't understand your criteria, neither in the abstract nor
> as they relate to the concrete list you supplied.
I understand Marc as "let us check if with a minimal effort we can make
real progress by adding features every major implementation has or
could adds easily". Marc, Am I correct?
More information about the R6RS