[R6RS] Re: R6RS = Common Scheme?
Mon Jan 26 04:02:48 EST 2004
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Feeley <feeley at IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:
Marc> Note that after the implementations change, then these features are in
Marc> the intersection! In a sense, what I am saying is that with some
Marc> relatively small amount of discussion we can make the major
Marc> implementations of Scheme agree on the syntax and semantics of
Marc> operations they currently have with possibly slightly different syntax
Marc> and semantics (lexical syntax extensions, filesystem operations, etc)
Marc> or that are sufficiently simple and uncontroversial that they can
Marc> easily be added to implementations where these features don't exist.
I guess I'm thoroughly confused. Would a better word for "common" be
"uncontroversial," then? How did you arrive at your list?
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
More information about the R6RS